Implicature in Language: Unlocking the Layers of Meaning

  • Article's photo | Credit
  • Language is a powerful tool for conveying thoughts and ideas. But often, the true meaning behind our words lies not just in what we say, but in what we imply. This subtle art of conveying hidden messages is known as implicature, a fascinating concept in the realm of linguistics.

What is Implicature?

Implicature refers to the additional meaning that is conveyed indirectly by an utterance beyond the literal meaning of the words used. It involves the inferences made by listeners based on contextual clues, background knowledge, and the cooperative principles governing communication.

Implicature is a subset of pragmaticsOpens in new window, focusing specifically on the inferred meanings in communication. Unlike semanticsOpens in new window, which deals with the literal meaning of words and sentences, implicature delves into the inferred meanings that arise from the context, speaker intentions, and shared knowledge between interlocutors.

Think of it like this: the literal meaning of your words is the tip of the iceberg, while the implicature is the vast, unseen portion below the surface. For instance, if you tell someone "It's getting late," the literal meaning might simply be stating the time. However, the implicature could be that you're tired and would like to end the conversation or head home.

The Mechanisms of Implicature

Implicature operates through various mechanisms, with the primary ones being the cooperative principle and Gricean maxims. Proposed by philosopher H.P. Grice in his seminal work on pragmatics, the cooperative principle posits that in communication, speakers and listeners cooperate to achieve effective exchange of information.

Grice identified four maxims that underlie the cooperative principle:

  1. Relation: The speaker's utterance should be relevant to the conversation.
  2. Quantity: The speaker should provide only as much information as is necessary.
  3. Quality: The speaker should only say what they believe to be true and can be supported.
  4. Manner: Be clear, concise, and well-organized.

Grice stipulated that speakers are expected to adhere to these maxims to uphold the cooperative principle. However, violations or flouting of these maxims often lead to implicatures, as listeners infer meanings beyond what is explicitly stated to maintain coherence and relevance in the conversation.

Types of Implicature

Implicature can be broadly categorized into two main types: conventional implicature and conversational implicature.

  1. Conventional Implicature

    Conventional implicature arises directly from specific linguistic expressions. These expressions carry additional meaning beyond their literal interpretation, but this extra meaning is inherent to the language itself and doesn't depend on context or specific conversational principles. A good example is the word "but" in the phrase "She's poor, but honest." Here, "but" implies a contrast between being poor and honest, regardless of the situation.

  2. Conversational Implicature

    Conversational implicature, in contrast, arises from the specific context of a conversation. It relies on the cooperative principle and Gricean maxims, ensuring efficient and informative communication.

    Conversational implicature encompasses the vast array of implied meanings listeners infer to grasp the speaker's intended message within the context. Consider this example:

    Peter meets Rupert in the hall of a technology research institution. Peter asks, "How is it going with John?"

    To an outsider who doesn't share Peter and Rupert's background knowledge, this utterance could have many interpretations. However, Rupert can use the context of their shared environment (a research institution) and their likely shared knowledge (about colleagues) to understand the implicature. Rupert infers that "John" refers to a specific person, likely "John Smith" who works for Microsoft and is interested in licensing the product called GuideBeam. This process of lifting meaning from the context and shared knowledge in relation to an utterance exemplifies conversational implicature.

Examples: Understanding Implicature in Action

To grasp the essence of implicature, one must delve into real-life examples that highlight its subtle nuances.

Consider a scenario where a friend arrives late to a meeting, and you remark, "You've finally decided to join us."

Although the literal meaning suggests acknowledgment of their presence, the implicature conveys a subtle hint of disapproval or jest regarding their tardiness. Similarly, in a formal setting, a speaker may employ understatement to convey emphasis, as in the statement, "The weather is not exactly pleasant," implying adverse conditions without explicit condemnation.


Implicature plays a crucial role in making our communication more efficient and nuanced. It allows us to express subtle ideas, be indirect when needed, and avoid being overly blunt. It also adds a layer of humor or sarcasm to our language.

However, relying too heavily on implicature can sometimes lead to misunderstandings, especially across cultures where conversational norms differ. So, while it's a powerful tool, it's important to be clear and consider your audience when using implicature. By understanding implicature, we can become better communicators, both as speakers and listeners. We can learn to decode the hidden meanings in conversations and ensure our own messages are interpreted as intended.

  • Share
  • References
    • Mastering Natural Language Processing. By Cybellium Ltd

Trending Collections

Recommended Books to Flex Your Knowledge